True or False Quiz

True or False

1 / 25

Category: Psychological safety

Individuals often find it less risky to remain silent in meetings than to propose an idea that might not be well-received.

2 / 25

Category: Psychological safety

Psychological safety encourages people to take interpersonal risks, like asking questions or admitting mistakes.

3 / 25

Category: Psychological safety

In psychologically safe teams, criticism is avoided at all costs to protect everyone’s feelings.

4 / 25

Category: Psychological safety

When team members feel safe, they’re more likely to contribute creative ideas and challenge the status quo.

5 / 25

Category: Psychological safety

Psychological safety is important for managers and team leaders, not for employees.

6 / 25

Category: Dependability

A colleague who always meets deadlines but never communicates delays or issues can still be considered dependable.

FALSE – Dependability includes transparent communication, not just results.

7 / 25

Category: Dependability

Being on time and prepared for a meeting shows respect and strengthens trust in a team.

8 / 25

Category: Dependability

As long as the team delivers on time, missing a minor task doesn’t need to be flagged

FALSE – Even small tasks matter. Reliability is built through consistency.

9 / 25

Category: Dependability

Offering to help a teammate who’s overwhelmed is part of being dependable.

10 / 25

Category: Dependability

Being dependable means accepting every task, trusting that I can count on my colleagues to help me complete it

FALSE –dependability includes setting limits and communicating clearly—not overcommitting and relying on others to fix it.

11 / 25

Category: Structure & Clarity

Documenting decision-making responsibilities tends to reduce delays and repeated approvals.

12 / 25

Category: Structure & Clarity

Allowing each team to choose its own tool for recording final decisions usually strengthens transparency across the project

13 / 25

Category: Structure & Clarity

Offering multiple formats (text, visuals, short videos) for internal training materials helps ensure key information is accessible to team members with different learning preferences.

14 / 25

Category: Structure & Clarity

Relying solely on spoken agreements during meetings can create confusion—especially when team members speak different native languages.

15 / 25

Category: Structure & Clarity

Establishing clear rules for using digital tools—like file naming or folder structures—can prevent workflow friction in cross-functional teams.

16 / 25

Category: Meaning

Meaning at work comes mainly from major achievements or formal recognition.

17 / 25

Category: Meaning

Small actions, like completing a routine task or answering a message, can support the values of a team.

18 / 25

Category: Meaning

If you don’t feel personally inspired by a task, it means it has no meaningful impact.

19 / 25

Category: Meaning

Meaning is something fixed: either your role has it or it doesn’t.

20 / 25

Category: Meaning

Staying silent when someone excels at their work helps avoid making them uncomfortable by putting them in the spotlight.

21 / 25

Category: Impact

Inclusive language acknowledges diversity, conveys respect to all people, is sensitive to differences, and promotes equal opportunities.

22 / 25

Category: Impact

Specific work-relared words such as "manpower", "handicapped parking spots" are fine to use, since everyone knows their meaning.

23 / 25

Category: Impact

Whenever you encounter problematic behaviours at work, you should immediately speak up and confront the person responsible.

24 / 25

Category: Impact

Stepping down from specific situations may help other colleagues find their voice.

25 / 25

Category: Impact

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion policies are good, but Management should first solve more important issues within the workplace.

Your score is

The average score is 0%

0%

Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or Agence Erasmus+ France / Education Formation. Neither the European Union nor the grating authority can be held responsible for them. Project Number: 2023-1-FR01-KA220-VET-000152480

All resources are published under the Creative Commons License CC BY-NC 4.0

Scroll to Top